Just because an M&A deal has been announced doesn’t mean it’s going to happen. But the exact data on how often, and especially why deals fail, is still surprising and insightful.
In a 2019 study, McKinsey reviewed more than 2,800 deals that were announced between 2012 and 2018 and valued at more than 1 billion €. The goal: Identify the type of deals that would be less likely to close once announced. 265 deals from that data set were canceled.
In this article, we will summarize the learnings from McKinsey’s study, and analyze how large deals have a higher chance of successfully closing.
Why large M&A deals fail
The consequences of deal abandonment can be severe, affecting both the reputation and share price of the parties involved.
Besides companies incurring the obvious one-off costs like advisory and termination fees, senior managers in these businesses are often perceived as having wasted precious time and resources pursuing a strategic path that turned out to be a dead end.
Just look at the following deals which kicked up a storm in the M&A world over the past few months:
- USD 20 billion+ Unity – AppLovin deal which recently created an unnecessary PR mess for all parties involved and dented the stock prices.
- The ongoing USD 40 billion+ Musk – Twitter deal which we all know is a mess with Twitter shareholders suffering at the receiving end.
- Musk’s random announcement to acquire MUFC and the rescinding of the announcement later yet again created a huge PR mess.
Prioritizing what problems to attack first might help save a lot of reputation, time and costs if one was to invest in pursuing strategic growth via M&A.
Reasons for deal failure
The obstacles cited most in various studies include:
- Mismatched expectations around synergies and value creation.
- Regulatory concerns.
- Political issues.
The exhibit below presents the top reasons for a deal going sour before crossing the finish line:
Differences between deal sizes
Another interesting insight is that the larger the deal, the larger the chance of failure. The exhibit below presents deal failures by the size of the deal. Deals larger than €10 billion are more than 2x as likely to fail as deals below €5 billion.
Differences between sectors
Another interesting way to look at these failed deals is by sector. Deals in the communication sector have the highest drop-out rate historically.
Below is an exhibit presenting the deal drop-outs per sector historically:
So how can the C-suite avoid failure or invest only the right amount of time and resources while pursuing mergers? Let’s go through the most important aspects.
Communication & transparency
Misunderstandings and miscommunications, which most often appear just before or during the due diligence stage when buyers and sellers are still setting price expectations, can sink the completion of large transactions.
Transparent and frequent dialogue between all the stakeholders is the only way to get all the parties aligned and all motivations accounted for.
Anticipate regulatory concerns
Transactions involving companies that have substantial market shares and that own important industry standards, licenses, permits, processes, and technologies will inevitably attract close attention from regulatory agencies.
Anticipating and measuring all the risks, trade-offs along with their remedies/interventions upfront will enable
Keep the political landscape in mind
Big deals often involve companies that are firmly plugged into local and national economies. Companies like Amazon or Google are a central source of employment in large cities leading the industry in terms of technology innovation and market share.
Governments may use their powers to block transactions involving such companies for any number of reasons—among them, national security issues (particularly in sensitive industries such as defense) and financial concerns (for instance, keeping a large employer in a structurally weak region). Just look at what happened to TikTok in the US amidst the souring of US-China trade relationships.
Having your M&A Playbook in place
While M&As can prove to be a very powerful growth engine and despite the best intentions of leaders, many businesses fall short of their attempts to integrate people, processes, and technology — much to the detriment of their company/business/organization.
Unsuccessful integration efforts will take way too long, wasting precious time, workforce, funds, and other tools that do not support objectives. As a result, opportunities to create value go unrealized while business disruptions increase.
One of the most critical strategies an organization will use in high-pressure integration efforts is playbooks. An M&A playbook is a roadmap for the merger and acquisition process. It contains some of the best tried and tested practices designed to assist the organization during this complex, information-dense period.
It can be implemented across organizations to help them drive a systematic M&A process across all the deals.
How to enable post-close excellence in integration
But wait, are we at the finish line now that we have done everything right? Not really.
One cannot judge a deal by the market’s response to its announcement. It is only after the first 12 to 18 months of integration and after companies have reported the performance of their first year that the markets can reliably predict the success of the deal.
So what do leaders do differently to successfully close a deal and create shareholder value?
Well, another McKinsey study reveals the following aspects of the M&A integration playbook seems have played important roles in delivering a successful deal and create value:
To avoid the consequences of deal abandonment, successfully complete a deal and create shareholder value, all leaders must:
- Be upfront and transparent with all motivations accounted for;
- Envisage and plan mitigation strategies for various risks, including political and regulatory risks, in advance; and
- Investing time in achieving post close excellence by rigorously planning for post merger integration. Creating well-developed playbooks function as both a business plan and a how to field guide, keeping the integration teams focused on creating value while providing step-by-step guidance for tactical implementations.